Which decision-making model involves collaboration and consensus among peers?

The Collegial Model is characterized by involving collaboration and consensus among peers, which makes it particularly relevant in team-oriented environments, such as healthcare settings. This model emphasizes shared decision-making, where input from all team members is valued, fostering a sense of ownership and commitment to the decisions made. By leveraging the expertise and perspectives of diverse team members, the Collegial Model aims to achieve well-rounded and informed outcomes that benefit the organization and its stakeholders.

In contrast, other models differ significantly in their approach. The Bureaucratic Model is more hierarchical, focusing on established rules and procedures rather than collaboration. The Garbage Can Model suggests that decision-making can be chaotic and lacks a structured approach, often leading to decisions being made based on timing and the confluence of various problems and solutions without collaboration. Lastly, the Analytical Model is data-driven and systematic but may not prioritize the insights and agreement from peers in the same way as the Collegial Model. This is why the Collegial Model is the most fitting answer for decision-making that values collaboration and consensus.