Which approach is based on providing evidence to support change?

The rationale behind selecting the approach that is based on providing evidence to support change is rooted in the principles of rationality and empirical evidence. The rational empirical strategy emphasizes utilizing data, research findings, and factual information to advocate for change, making it a systematic and logical method. This approach is grounded in the belief that individuals are more likely to change their behaviors and attitudes when presented with clear, credible evidence that demonstrates the benefits of new practices or policies.

This method encourages open communication and informed decision-making, as it relies on rational discourse and factual information rather than manipulation or emotional persuasion. By using evidence, leaders can effectively justify the need for change, helping stakeholders understand the rationale behind it and facilitating a smoother transition.

In contrast, other strategies mentioned do not emphasize the use of evidence in the same manner. The normative reeducative strategy, for example, focuses on changing norms and values through social interaction rather than empirical evidence. The power coercive strategy relies on authority and the ability to enforce change through mandates or requirements, without necessarily providing evidence. Lastly, the emotional appeal strategy seeks to engage individuals on an emotional level, which may resonate with people but does not directly leverage data or research to support the need for change. Thus, the emphasis on evidence in the