What is a requirement under the Privacy Rule for clinical research disclosures?

Study for the NEA-BC test with engaging multiple-choice questions and comprehensive explanations. Enhance your preparation and increase your chances of passing the exam successfully!

The Privacy Rule, part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), provides stringent guidelines about the handling and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) in clinical research. One of the key requirements for disclosing PHI for research purposes is that the disclosure must involve a specific written agreement that includes an expiration date and a dated signature. This ensures that there is a clear understanding and agreement regarding the use of individuals' health information, protecting participants’ privacy rights and allowing for accountability in data management.

This requirement is essential because it provides a structured and documented consent process that aligns with the legal standards set forth by HIPAA. The expiration date ensures that the consent is only valid for a limited time, allowing participants to have an understanding of how long their information will be used and for what specific purposes. Additionally, a dated signature confirms that the participant consented to the disclosure and understands the scope of their involvement in the research, contributing to the ethical conduct of clinical investigations.

While approval from a regulatory board is a standard procedure in clinical research, it does not specifically address the requirement for participant consent in the context of the Privacy Rule. Similarly, having a written agreement from participants is significant but does not encompass the details of expiration and the need

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy