What does the concept of "force" typically indicate in conflict resolution?

In the context of conflict resolution, the concept of "force" typically indicates coercion. This aligns with a win/lose scenario where one party imposes its will on another, often disregarding the needs or rights of the other party involved in the conflict. Coercion can manifest through pressure tactics, threats, or taking advantage of power imbalances, and it aims to achieve a resolution that favors one party while leaving the other at a disadvantage.

The dynamics of conflict resolution suggest that using force, or coercive methods, does not facilitate genuine agreement or collaboration. Rather, it can breed resentment and further conflict, making lasting resolutions less likely. In contrast, approaches like compromise and collaboration aim for a win/win outcome where both parties can feel satisfied with the resolution. Therefore, in the context of the question, the identification of force as indicating coercion underlines the adversarial nature of such an approach in conflict resolution.