In the peer review ranking system, what signifies a variance that resulted in negative outcomes?

In the context of a peer review ranking system, identifying a variance that resulted in negative outcomes is crucial for quality improvement and patient safety. When care is described as not consistent with typical practices, it indicates that the provider's actions diverged from established standards or norms in the field. This inconsistency can be indicative of potential errors, lapses in judgment, or deviations from best practices that may have contributed to adverse patient outcomes.

The emphasis on requiring mentoring suggests that the individual has acknowledged the need for professional development or support to align their practices with accepted standards. This is a proactive approach to address gaps in care and emphasizes ongoing education and improvement. Therefore, recognizing and addressing these variances is essential to enhance the quality of care and reduce the likelihood of negative outcomes in the future.